The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor
David S. Landes
Non-fiction · Economic history
Recommended 17 times on Highstreett
Buy from Bookshop.orgWe may earn a commission when you buy through this Bookshop.org link.
About this book
David S. Landes tells the long, fascinating story of wealth and power throughout the world: the creation of wealth, the paths of winners and losers, the rise and fall of nations. He studies history as a process, attempting to understand how the world's cultures lead to - or retard - economic and military success and material achievement. Countries of the West, Landes asserts, prospered early through the interplay of a vital, open society focused on work and knowledge, which led to increased productivity, the creation of new technologies, and the pursuit of change. Europe's key advantage lay in invention and know-how, as applied in war, transportation, generation of power, and skill in metalwork. Even such now banal inventions as eyeglasses and the clock were, in their day, powerful levers that tipped the balance of world economic power. Today's new economic winners are following much the same roads to power, while the laggards have somehow failed to duplicate this crucial formula for success. The key to relieving much of the world's poverty lies in understanding the lessons history has to teach us - lessons uniquely imparted in this towering work of history.
You might also like
Each one checked against a book catalogue before it was listed here.
- Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared Diamond
- The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 by Paul Kennedy
- The Collapse of Complex Societies by Joseph A. Tainter
- Plagues and Peoples by William H. McNeill
- The Decline of the West: An Outline of a Morphology of World History by Oswald Spengler
- The Fate of Rome: Climate, Disease, and the End of an Empire by Kyle Harper
What readers said
Not yet rated. We show what readers thought once at least 3 of them have said something, because a verdict from one or two is not a verdict.
